(12-02-2022, 04:19 AM)The One Wrote: From what I understood based on what the commentators said, it seems to be a technicality.
For example, in rugby, there are two questions a ref asks the video ref.
1. Is it a try, yes or no?
2. Is there any reason why I can't award the try?
In the first case, on field ref doesn't know, so asks the video ref to make the decision.
In 2nd case, the ref thinks it's a try, and asks if they have evidence to the contrary. In this case, the burden of proof is with the video ref and they should see absolutely clear evidence that says it's not a try.
In this case it seems to be similar to second case. Apparently, since the on field ref awarded the try, the video ref must see clear evidence to the contrary. And since if even a tiny part of the ball is in line with the out line means ball is in play, unless you have a camera directly above the ball you can't be sure, so they must award the goal.
Or you could simply say you loved living in Japan.